Czechia

   
 

Executive Summary

 
Developments during the review period have confirmed the successful establishment, development, and protection of basic democratic institutions. Procedures for selecting candidates and voting adhere to good international practices, and the government operates with reasonable transparency. Laws ensure freedom of information, with structures in place for parliamentary oversight, auditing by an independent office, and control by independent media. Additionally, government-wide and ministerial structures have been established for policy discussion and coordination, involving external stakeholders.
 
However, corruption and the close ties between political and economic power remain significant weaknesses. The media control by former Prime Minister Andrej Babiš was significantly reduced by the final approval in 2023 of amendments to the conflict-of-interest law, though these will be only partially effective. While political competition is not formally restricted, financial backing provides a substantial advantage, as seen in presidential elections where candidates heavily depend on business group support.
 
During this period, the government was a five-party coalition with a parliamentary majority. Although not always unified in its stance, the visibility of differences over EU policy, environmental, and gender issues encourages public debate. An active structure for tripartite consultation exists, involving the government, trade unions, and employers’ organizations, alongside non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that advocate on various issues. Several NGO representatives are included in government advisory committees and have, in some cases, significantly influenced legislation.
 
The state budget has been the central issue in economic policy. Tax revenue as a share of GDP remains low by European standards, limiting the scope for investment and spending in other areas. The slow growth and increasing debt during the pandemic extended into 2023, with high inflation persisting. Slower income growth led to reduced consumption and a further GDP decline.
 
In response, the government introduced a 2023 package that cut spending and increased taxes, especially on businesses. Public sector employees and pensioners are the main losers, while cuts to government subsidies for enterprises threaten other objectives. Assuming economic growth recovers despite budget restrictions and excluding external shocks, there is no imminent threat of budget instability.
 
Long-term prospects are also threatened by a general labor shortage. Foreign workers have partially filled the gap, but the integration of foreigners remains a persistent weakness, limiting the import of skilled labor. The influx of Ukrainian refugees has brought significant changes in this area and spurred some protest actions by extra-parliamentary groups opposing government economic policies, refugee aid, and support for Ukraine’s war effort.
 
Addressing the labor shortage domestically is hampered by inadequate early childhood care facilities, reflecting a preference for encouraging parents to stay home with young children. Gender issues are viewed with suspicion by some political segments, concerned about perceived threats to the traditional family. Nevertheless, high employment levels have kept poverty relatively low, and the pension system has ensured adequate, though not high, pensions relative to average earnings. Social exclusion remains a serious issue for the Roma minority, who continue to face discrimination, as well as for other social groups.
 
Policies on infrastructure development, the environment, and climate change have aligned with EU directives, receiving strong support from some politicians and pressure groups, but evident reluctance from others. EU support has compensated for inadequate state budget resources. While this support is not permanent, the EU-funded National Recovery Plan offers assistance in various policy areas for the next few years.
 
Czechia has been passive in international initiatives, ranking among the poorest OECD members in efforts to combat climate change and showing weak involvement in international economic and social development. However, during the review period, significant changes occurred, particularly in aid for Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees.
Back to Top