Consensus-Building
#21Key Findings
In the category of consensus-building, Latvia falls into the sample’s lower-middle ranks (rank 21).
Ministries can initiate national research programs with an interdisciplinary focus on critical issues. Short time frames and funding constraints often discourage researchers from participating in policymaking.
The umbrella labor and employers groups have a strong influence on policy, and participate in working groups and cabinet meetings. An official tripartite cooperation council brings unions and employers associations together with the government. Government contact with social welfare groups is more sporadic, with limited information exchange.
A process for integrating environmental groups’ insights into policymaking is being developed. Such groups often currently feel that they are unable to influence policy. Data sharing and open government programs are comparatively underdeveloped.
Ministries can initiate national research programs with an interdisciplinary focus on critical issues. Short time frames and funding constraints often discourage researchers from participating in policymaking.
The umbrella labor and employers groups have a strong influence on policy, and participate in working groups and cabinet meetings. An official tripartite cooperation council brings unions and employers associations together with the government. Government contact with social welfare groups is more sporadic, with limited information exchange.
A process for integrating environmental groups’ insights into policymaking is being developed. Such groups often currently feel that they are unable to influence policy. Data sharing and open government programs are comparatively underdeveloped.
Graph View
Graph View
To what extent is the government successful in effectively harnessing the best available scientific knowledge for policymaking purposes?
10
9
9
The government is able to harness the best available scientific knowledge for policymaking purposes.
8
7
6
7
6
In most cases, the government is able to harness the best available scientific knowledge for policymaking purposes.
5
4
3
4
3
Only rarely is the government able to harness the best available scientific knowledge for policymaking purposes.
2
1
1
The government is not able to harness the best available scientific knowledge for policymaking purposes.
National Research Programs (NRPs) in Latvia are initiated by ministries based on their specific needs and funding. These top-down, multi- and interdisciplinary studies focus on various scientific fields and groups. NRPs support science by guiding Latvia in identifying and investigating critical issues for sustainable development and shaping the focus of Latvian scientific institutions’ work.
Ministries and other public institutions, such as local governments, also commission studies individually. Once a survey is finished, it is published in a public database maintained by the State Chancellery. As a center of government, the State Chancellery conducts various studies to develop evidence-based public administration. However, Latvia needs more capacity and funding to systematically generate significant evidence that supports policy identification and implementation.
Non-governmental experts are usually invited to participate in task force units or specially designed working groups. However, there is limited information on whether the expertise provided by these experts has been utilized effectively and has positively affected policy outcomes.
The process of obtaining scientific knowledge for policymaking is constrained by procurement and grant procedures with strict, administratively demanding, and relatively short time limits that discourage scientists from delivering scientific evidence.
Latvian policy coordination and implementation rely on numerous policy documents (i.e., white papers) and cross-ministerial working groups. However, this interministerial approach does not depend on scientific evidence.
The ombudsman has criticized the government’s decisions during the COVID-19 crisis, explicitly pointing out its failure to heed scientific advice. This criticism highlights concerns about the government’s approach to managing the pandemic, indicating a perceived need for sufficient engagement with scientific expertise in decision-making processes (Meļņiks, 2021).
The non-governmental expert does not frequently criticize superficial or token participation. In 2021, however, amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers’ Rules of Procedure were criticized. These amendments were supposed to narrow social and civil dialogue in meetings of the Secretaries of State, the Cabinet of Ministers, and cabinet committees. Still, these amendments were not adopted, possibly following objections from the non-governmental sector.
Citations:
Latvijas Zinātnes padome. 2023. “Valsts pētījumu programma (VPP).” https://www.lzp.gov.lv/lv/valsts-petijumu-programma-vpp
Valsts kanceleja. “Pētījumu un publikāciju datubāze.” https://ppdb.mk.gov.lv/datubaze/
Ministru kabinets. “Pētījumi.” https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/petijum
European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support, Mackie, I., Fobé, E., Škarica, M., Reinholde, I., et al. 2022. “Evidence-informed policy making: building a conceptual model and developing indicators.” Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/81339
Meļņiks, R. 2021. “Tiesībsargs: šodien lemtais iespaidos mūsu dzīvi ilgtermiņā.” https://www.diena.lv/raksts/viedokli/latvija/tiesibsargs-sodien-lemtais-iespaidos-musu-dzivi-ilgtermina-14256164
Delfi. 2021. “Sabiedrības iespēju mazināšanās – pauž bažas par valdības kārtības ruļļa izmaiņām.” https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/53507543/sabiedribas-iespeju-mazinasanas-pauz-bazas-par-valdibas-kartibas-rulla-izmainam
Ministries and other public institutions, such as local governments, also commission studies individually. Once a survey is finished, it is published in a public database maintained by the State Chancellery. As a center of government, the State Chancellery conducts various studies to develop evidence-based public administration. However, Latvia needs more capacity and funding to systematically generate significant evidence that supports policy identification and implementation.
Non-governmental experts are usually invited to participate in task force units or specially designed working groups. However, there is limited information on whether the expertise provided by these experts has been utilized effectively and has positively affected policy outcomes.
The process of obtaining scientific knowledge for policymaking is constrained by procurement and grant procedures with strict, administratively demanding, and relatively short time limits that discourage scientists from delivering scientific evidence.
Latvian policy coordination and implementation rely on numerous policy documents (i.e., white papers) and cross-ministerial working groups. However, this interministerial approach does not depend on scientific evidence.
The ombudsman has criticized the government’s decisions during the COVID-19 crisis, explicitly pointing out its failure to heed scientific advice. This criticism highlights concerns about the government’s approach to managing the pandemic, indicating a perceived need for sufficient engagement with scientific expertise in decision-making processes (Meļņiks, 2021).
The non-governmental expert does not frequently criticize superficial or token participation. In 2021, however, amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers’ Rules of Procedure were criticized. These amendments were supposed to narrow social and civil dialogue in meetings of the Secretaries of State, the Cabinet of Ministers, and cabinet committees. Still, these amendments were not adopted, possibly following objections from the non-governmental sector.
Citations:
Latvijas Zinātnes padome. 2023. “Valsts pētījumu programma (VPP).” https://www.lzp.gov.lv/lv/valsts-petijumu-programma-vpp
Valsts kanceleja. “Pētījumu un publikāciju datubāze.” https://ppdb.mk.gov.lv/datubaze/
Ministru kabinets. “Pētījumi.” https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/petijum
European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support, Mackie, I., Fobé, E., Škarica, M., Reinholde, I., et al. 2022. “Evidence-informed policy making: building a conceptual model and developing indicators.” Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/81339
Meļņiks, R. 2021. “Tiesībsargs: šodien lemtais iespaidos mūsu dzīvi ilgtermiņā.” https://www.diena.lv/raksts/viedokli/latvija/tiesibsargs-sodien-lemtais-iespaidos-musu-dzivi-ilgtermina-14256164
Delfi. 2021. “Sabiedrības iespēju mazināšanās – pauž bažas par valdības kārtības ruļļa izmaiņām.” https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/53507543/sabiedribas-iespeju-mazinasanas-pauz-bazas-par-valdibas-kartibas-rulla-izmainam
Graph View
To what extent does the government facilitate the participation of trade unions and business organizations in policymaking?
10
9
9
The government is able to effectively involve trade unions and business organizations in policy development.
8
7
6
7
6
Most of the time, the government is able to effectively involve trade unions and business organizations in policy development.
5
4
3
4
3
The government is rarely able to effectively involve trade unions and business organizations in policy development.
2
1
1
The government is not able to effectively involve trade unions and business organizations in policy development.
The involvement of civil society organizations (CSOs) is facilitated through a structured approach in the policy development process within sectoral ministries in Latvia. This includes early CSO engagement in discussions, ensuring that various societal interests are represented in decision-making, and fostering open and responsible planning. The process is designed to ensure genuine collaboration between ministries and CSOs, constructive dialogue, and the inclusion of diverse groups in budget planning and oversight. However, the approach acknowledges the limited financial and human resources of CSOs and the non-remunerative nature of their participation. Thus, there is a need for further capacity-building of CSO organizations to ensure effective communication in the policymaking process.
The government has created opportunities for civil society organizations (CSOs) to participate in policymaking through online tools where policy proposals are accessible to the public and CSOs (e.g., the TAP portal). Additionally, 526 CSOs signed the Memorandum between the government and CSOs in November 2023. Regular meetings of the Council of the Memorandum oversee the implementation of the cooperation memorandum. In 2023, the Memorandum Council discussed upcoming legislation on public participation in decision-making and local referenda.
The Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia (LBAS), the Latvian Chambers of Commerce (LTRK), and the Employers Confederation of Latvia (LDDK) are the most significant CSOs representing labor and capital and capable of influencing policymaking processes as well as policy outcomes.
LDDK represents the interests of employers, usually advocating for business-friendly policies and engaging in social dialogue with government and labor unions. It often plays a crucial role in shaping Latvia’s labor market policies and economic strategies. LDDK focuses on updates relevant to Latvian business environments and strategic priorities, including geopolitical, economic, social, and digital transformation challenges. It mentions the involvement of experts in more than 1,000 policy-planning activities and the integration of 64 directives into national employment regulations in 2022 (LDDK Gada Pārskats, 2023).
LTRK addresses the needs of small businesses by facilitating meetings with ministries and conducting education campaigns to amplify their voices. The Latvian Free Trade Union Confederation (LBAS) focuses on occupational safety, labor law, gender equality issues, the European Semester, education, youth employment, sectoral expert councils, social issues, international action, and the economy.
LTRK, LDDK, and LBAS are known as the big three and are usually present in working groups and at Cabinet of Ministers meetings. Several smaller CSOs exist, but they channel their opinions through the most prominent players in the field.
The National Tripartite Cooperation Council (NTSP) is a platform that brings together employers’ associations, business associations, and trade unions. The council serves as a policy decision-making and implementation tool, particularly on labor markets, legislation, and social security issues. Over the years, it has proved to be an effective platform for uniting various interests.
Civil society organizations (CSOs) do not often express dissatisfaction with token participation in policymaking because they are usually included in important meetings. However, recent criticism has been directed at the government concerning the development of a government action plan. Critics note that not all ministries have sufficiently involved social partners in formulating growth-oriented government deliverables. Additionally, there has been criticism of the contents of the government declaration.
Citations:
Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācija. ” https://lddk.lv/en/about-lddk/more-about-lddk/”
Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācija. “Gada pārskati.” https://lddk.lv/par-lddk/gada-parskati/
Latvijas Tirdzniecības un Rūpniecības kamera. “Paveiktie darbi biedru interešu pārstāvībā.” https://www.ltrk.lv/lv/content/5089
Latvijas Brīvo arodbiedrību savienība. “Darbības virzieni.” https://arodbiedribas.lv/darbibas-virzieni/
Finanšu ministrija. 2020. “Nevalstisko organizāciju (NVO) iesaiste budžeta izstrādes procesā nozaru ministrijās.” https://www.fm.gov.lv/lv/media/1118/download
Latvijas Pilsoniskā alianse. “In Latvian.” https://nvo.lv/lv/musejie/biedri/#darba_deveju_organizacijas_arodbiedribas_profesionalas_biedribas_un_dibinajumi
Latvijas darba devēju konfederācija. 2024. “LDDK vērtējumā valdības rīcības plāna izstrādes procesā un satura kvalitātē trūkusi konsekvence.” https://lddk.lv/aktualitate/jaunumi/lddk-vertejuma-valdibas-ricibas-plana-izstrades-procesa-un-satura-kvalitate-trukusi-konsekvence/
Latvijas darba devēju konfederācija. 2023. “LDDK: valdības deklarācijā trūkst skaidra redzējuma un ambiciozu mērķu ekonomikā.” https://lddk.lv/aktualitate/jaunumi/lddk-valdibas-deklaracija-trukst-skaidra-redzejuma-un-ambiciozu-merku-ekonomika/
The government has created opportunities for civil society organizations (CSOs) to participate in policymaking through online tools where policy proposals are accessible to the public and CSOs (e.g., the TAP portal). Additionally, 526 CSOs signed the Memorandum between the government and CSOs in November 2023. Regular meetings of the Council of the Memorandum oversee the implementation of the cooperation memorandum. In 2023, the Memorandum Council discussed upcoming legislation on public participation in decision-making and local referenda.
The Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia (LBAS), the Latvian Chambers of Commerce (LTRK), and the Employers Confederation of Latvia (LDDK) are the most significant CSOs representing labor and capital and capable of influencing policymaking processes as well as policy outcomes.
LDDK represents the interests of employers, usually advocating for business-friendly policies and engaging in social dialogue with government and labor unions. It often plays a crucial role in shaping Latvia’s labor market policies and economic strategies. LDDK focuses on updates relevant to Latvian business environments and strategic priorities, including geopolitical, economic, social, and digital transformation challenges. It mentions the involvement of experts in more than 1,000 policy-planning activities and the integration of 64 directives into national employment regulations in 2022 (LDDK Gada Pārskats, 2023).
LTRK addresses the needs of small businesses by facilitating meetings with ministries and conducting education campaigns to amplify their voices. The Latvian Free Trade Union Confederation (LBAS) focuses on occupational safety, labor law, gender equality issues, the European Semester, education, youth employment, sectoral expert councils, social issues, international action, and the economy.
LTRK, LDDK, and LBAS are known as the big three and are usually present in working groups and at Cabinet of Ministers meetings. Several smaller CSOs exist, but they channel their opinions through the most prominent players in the field.
The National Tripartite Cooperation Council (NTSP) is a platform that brings together employers’ associations, business associations, and trade unions. The council serves as a policy decision-making and implementation tool, particularly on labor markets, legislation, and social security issues. Over the years, it has proved to be an effective platform for uniting various interests.
Civil society organizations (CSOs) do not often express dissatisfaction with token participation in policymaking because they are usually included in important meetings. However, recent criticism has been directed at the government concerning the development of a government action plan. Critics note that not all ministries have sufficiently involved social partners in formulating growth-oriented government deliverables. Additionally, there has been criticism of the contents of the government declaration.
Citations:
Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācija. ” https://lddk.lv/en/about-lddk/more-about-lddk/”
Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācija. “Gada pārskati.” https://lddk.lv/par-lddk/gada-parskati/
Latvijas Tirdzniecības un Rūpniecības kamera. “Paveiktie darbi biedru interešu pārstāvībā.” https://www.ltrk.lv/lv/content/5089
Latvijas Brīvo arodbiedrību savienība. “Darbības virzieni.” https://arodbiedribas.lv/darbibas-virzieni/
Finanšu ministrija. 2020. “Nevalstisko organizāciju (NVO) iesaiste budžeta izstrādes procesā nozaru ministrijās.” https://www.fm.gov.lv/lv/media/1118/download
Latvijas Pilsoniskā alianse. “In Latvian.” https://nvo.lv/lv/musejie/biedri/#darba_deveju_organizacijas_arodbiedribas_profesionalas_biedribas_un_dibinajumi
Latvijas darba devēju konfederācija. 2024. “LDDK vērtējumā valdības rīcības plāna izstrādes procesā un satura kvalitātē trūkusi konsekvence.” https://lddk.lv/aktualitate/jaunumi/lddk-vertejuma-valdibas-ricibas-plana-izstrades-procesa-un-satura-kvalitate-trukusi-konsekvence/
Latvijas darba devēju konfederācija. 2023. “LDDK: valdības deklarācijā trūkst skaidra redzējuma un ambiciozu mērķu ekonomikā.” https://lddk.lv/aktualitate/jaunumi/lddk-valdibas-deklaracija-trukst-skaidra-redzejuma-un-ambiciozu-merku-ekonomika/
To what extent does the government facilitate the participation of leading social welfare CSOs in policymaking?
10
9
9
The government is able to effectively involve leading social welfare CSOs in policy development.
8
7
6
7
6
Most of the time, the government is able to effectively involve leading social welfare CSOs in policy development.
5
4
3
4
3
The government is rarely able to effectively involve leading social welfare CSOs in policy development.
2
1
1
The government is not able to effectively involve leading social welfare CSOs in policy development.
Social welfare CSOs are primarily involved in social service delivery, but their ability to participate in policy development varies. The Society Integration Foundation (SIF, a public agency) was established in 2001 to foster CSO involvement in social development policy. SIF aims to support and advance societal integration, managing and allocating resources for projects that foster the integration and development of the public and NGO sectors.
Throughout 2022 SIF consistently provided essential sustenance and material aid across Latvia, advancing social inclusion with diverse initiatives. With support packages totaling more than €769,000 distributed, CSOs also conducted events to educate on discrimination and promote equality, culminating in the multi-year “Openness is a value” campaign (Sabiedrības Integrācijas Fonds, 2023). The projects financed by the foundation thus strengthen the capacity of CSOs in both policy design and service delivery. However, CSOs often face sustainability challenges after implementing these projects.
Many CSOs participate in the advisory councils under the Ministry of Welfare, bringing sector-related expertise to the ministry. However, the cooperation process is poorly organized, with infrequent meetings and limited information exchange.
Major CSOs generally participate in the policymaking process without much dissatisfaction regarding their involvement. They are often invited and heard in parliamentary committee meetings, with no reported cases of denial if they are interested in participating. During the COVID-19 crisis, leading CSOs were involved in cabinet meetings and allowed to express their views. However, CSOs most commonly express dissatisfaction when their opinions, especially on contentious issues, are not considered in final decisions, even though they have had the opportunity to present their views.
CSOs active in social welfare often voice dissatisfaction with policy outcomes in their sector. In 2020, this discontent was evident when 15 leading NGOs in the social services sector signed a letter criticizing the Ministry of Welfare. They expressed frustration with the ministry’s failure, over the past 10 – 15 years, to effectively support the welfare sector’s interests. This criticism encompassed issues related to social service provision, social insurance, child rights protection, and the deinstitutionalization process.
Citations:
Sabiedrības integrācijas fonds. 2023. “Sabiedrības integrācijas fonda 2022. gada publiskais pārskats.” https://www.sif.gov.lv/lv/media/4938/download?attachment
Labklājības ministrija. 2021. “Senioru lietu padome.” https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/senioru-lietu-padome
Labklājības ministrija. 2020. “Sadarbības partneri.” https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/sadarbibas-partneri
Tiesībsargs. 2022. “Darbs pie 2022. gada Eiropas Komisijas Ziņojuma par tiesiskumu.” https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/ek_tiesiskums_kopsavilkums_1648193765.pdf
Latvijas pilsoniskā alianse. 2020. “15 vadošās sociālo pakalpojumu nozares organizācijas nosūtījušas prasības Labklājības ministrijai.” https://nvo.lv/lv/zina/15_vadosas_socialo_pakalpojumu_nozares_organizacijas_nosutijusas_prasibas_labklajibas_ministrijai
Throughout 2022 SIF consistently provided essential sustenance and material aid across Latvia, advancing social inclusion with diverse initiatives. With support packages totaling more than €769,000 distributed, CSOs also conducted events to educate on discrimination and promote equality, culminating in the multi-year “Openness is a value” campaign (Sabiedrības Integrācijas Fonds, 2023). The projects financed by the foundation thus strengthen the capacity of CSOs in both policy design and service delivery. However, CSOs often face sustainability challenges after implementing these projects.
Many CSOs participate in the advisory councils under the Ministry of Welfare, bringing sector-related expertise to the ministry. However, the cooperation process is poorly organized, with infrequent meetings and limited information exchange.
Major CSOs generally participate in the policymaking process without much dissatisfaction regarding their involvement. They are often invited and heard in parliamentary committee meetings, with no reported cases of denial if they are interested in participating. During the COVID-19 crisis, leading CSOs were involved in cabinet meetings and allowed to express their views. However, CSOs most commonly express dissatisfaction when their opinions, especially on contentious issues, are not considered in final decisions, even though they have had the opportunity to present their views.
CSOs active in social welfare often voice dissatisfaction with policy outcomes in their sector. In 2020, this discontent was evident when 15 leading NGOs in the social services sector signed a letter criticizing the Ministry of Welfare. They expressed frustration with the ministry’s failure, over the past 10 – 15 years, to effectively support the welfare sector’s interests. This criticism encompassed issues related to social service provision, social insurance, child rights protection, and the deinstitutionalization process.
Citations:
Sabiedrības integrācijas fonds. 2023. “Sabiedrības integrācijas fonda 2022. gada publiskais pārskats.” https://www.sif.gov.lv/lv/media/4938/download?attachment
Labklājības ministrija. 2021. “Senioru lietu padome.” https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/senioru-lietu-padome
Labklājības ministrija. 2020. “Sadarbības partneri.” https://www.lm.gov.lv/lv/sadarbibas-partneri
Tiesībsargs. 2022. “Darbs pie 2022. gada Eiropas Komisijas Ziņojuma par tiesiskumu.” https://www.tiesibsargs.lv/wp-content/uploads/migrate_2022/content/ek_tiesiskums_kopsavilkums_1648193765.pdf
Latvijas pilsoniskā alianse. 2020. “15 vadošās sociālo pakalpojumu nozares organizācijas nosūtījušas prasības Labklājības ministrijai.” https://nvo.lv/lv/zina/15_vadosas_socialo_pakalpojumu_nozares_organizacijas_nosutijusas_prasibas_labklajibas_ministrijai
To what extent does the government facilitate the participation of leading environmental CSOs in policymaking?
10
9
9
The government is able to effectively involve leading environmental CSOs in policy development.
8
7
6
7
6
Most of the time, the government is able to effectively involve leading environmental CSOs in policy development.
5
4
3
4
3
The government is rarely able to effectively involve leading environmental CSOs in policy development.
2
1
1
The government is not able to effectively involve leading environmental CSOs in policy development.
The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development is attempting to build a comprehensive approach for incorporating CSO insights into environmental matters. CSOs are invited to participate in task forces and advisory councils, outlining the mechanisms for their involvement in regional development and environmental protection. The ministry’s webpage provides a list of lobbying CSOs and serves as a resource for understanding the current landscape of environmental civil society organizations and their active engagement in governmental processes.
The State Audit Office conducted an audit on the involvement of CSOs in the agriculture sector in 2019. The audit revealed that an unorganized lobbying framework hinders access to information on critical decisions for various interest groups. The Law on Transparency of Interest Representation, which entered into force in January 2023, is expected to improve interest transparency.
Environmental civil society organizations (CSOs) often voice their dissatisfaction with policy outcomes in their sector. For example, environmental organizations in Latvia have expressed concerns about the government’s policies drifting away from sustainable development principles. These key environmental CSOs frequently express dissatisfaction with their level of involvement in policymaking. They feel their participation is often superficial and does not significantly influence policy decisions, particularly in environmental protection and sustainability.
Environmental CSOs expressed strong opposition to the appointment of the current Minister of Climate, Energy, and Environmental Protection before his appointment in 2023. Their concerns focus on the potential negative impact this appointment could have on the country’s environmental policies and sustainability efforts. This opposition underscores the critical role of ministerial appointments in shaping national environmental strategies and public trust in environmental governance. Despite these concerns from environmental organizations, the minister’s appointment was confirmed.
Citations:
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2021. “Sabiedrības līdzdalība.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/sabiedribas-lidzdaliba
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Padomes un komisijas.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/padomes-un-komisijas
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Interešu pārstāvības organizāciju saraksts.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/media/37536/download?attachment
Saeima. 2022. Law on Transparency of Interest Representation. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/336676-law-on-transparency-of-interest-representation%20
Valsts kontrole. 2019. “Nevalstisko organizāciju iesaiste Zemkopības ministrijas nozarēs aiz necaurskatāma aizsega.” https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile//uploads/reviziju-zinojumi/2018/2.4.1.-14_2018/Revi%CC%84zijas%20zin%CC%A7ojums_03.07.2019.pdf
Latvijas Dabas fonds. 2022. “Vides organizācijas pauž bažas par politikas attālināšanos no ilgtspējīgas attīstības principiem.” https://lvportals.lv/dienaskartiba/339611-vides-organizacijas-pauz-bazas-par-politikas-attalinasanos-no-ilgtspejigas-attistibas-principiem-2022
Latvijas Dabas fonds. 2023. “Latvijas Vides Organizācijas Kategoriski Iebilst Pret Melni (ZZS) Klimata, Enerģētikas un Vides Aizsardzības Ministra Amatā.” https://lvportals.lv/dienaskartiba/354831-latvijas-vides-organizacijas-kategoriski-iebilst-pret-melni-zzs-klimata-energetikas-un-vides-aizsardzibas-ministra-amata-2023
The State Audit Office conducted an audit on the involvement of CSOs in the agriculture sector in 2019. The audit revealed that an unorganized lobbying framework hinders access to information on critical decisions for various interest groups. The Law on Transparency of Interest Representation, which entered into force in January 2023, is expected to improve interest transparency.
Environmental civil society organizations (CSOs) often voice their dissatisfaction with policy outcomes in their sector. For example, environmental organizations in Latvia have expressed concerns about the government’s policies drifting away from sustainable development principles. These key environmental CSOs frequently express dissatisfaction with their level of involvement in policymaking. They feel their participation is often superficial and does not significantly influence policy decisions, particularly in environmental protection and sustainability.
Environmental CSOs expressed strong opposition to the appointment of the current Minister of Climate, Energy, and Environmental Protection before his appointment in 2023. Their concerns focus on the potential negative impact this appointment could have on the country’s environmental policies and sustainability efforts. This opposition underscores the critical role of ministerial appointments in shaping national environmental strategies and public trust in environmental governance. Despite these concerns from environmental organizations, the minister’s appointment was confirmed.
Citations:
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2021. “Sabiedrības līdzdalība.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/sabiedribas-lidzdaliba
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Padomes un komisijas.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/padomes-un-komisijas
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Interešu pārstāvības organizāciju saraksts.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/media/37536/download?attachment
Saeima. 2022. Law on Transparency of Interest Representation. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/336676-law-on-transparency-of-interest-representation%20
Valsts kontrole. 2019. “Nevalstisko organizāciju iesaiste Zemkopības ministrijas nozarēs aiz necaurskatāma aizsega.” https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile//uploads/reviziju-zinojumi/2018/2.4.1.-14_2018/Revi%CC%84zijas%20zin%CC%A7ojums_03.07.2019.pdf
Latvijas Dabas fonds. 2022. “Vides organizācijas pauž bažas par politikas attālināšanos no ilgtspējīgas attīstības principiem.” https://lvportals.lv/dienaskartiba/339611-vides-organizacijas-pauz-bazas-par-politikas-attalinasanos-no-ilgtspejigas-attistibas-principiem-2022
Latvijas Dabas fonds. 2023. “Latvijas Vides Organizācijas Kategoriski Iebilst Pret Melni (ZZS) Klimata, Enerģētikas un Vides Aizsardzības Ministra Amatā.” https://lvportals.lv/dienaskartiba/354831-latvijas-vides-organizacijas-kategoriski-iebilst-pret-melni-zzs-klimata-energetikas-un-vides-aizsardzibas-ministra-amata-2023
Graph View
To what extent does the government publish data and information that empowers citizens to hold the government accountable?
10
9
9
The government publishes data and information in a manner that empowers citizens to hold the government accountable.
8
7
6
7
6
Most of the time, the government publishes data and information in a manner that empowers citizens to hold the government accountable.
5
4
3
4
3
The government rarely publishes data and information in a manner that strengthens citizens to hold the government accountable.
2
1
1
The government does not publish data and information in a manner that strengthens citizens’ capacity to hold the government accountable.
In 2022, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted Latvia’s Fifth National Open Government Action Plan for 2022 – 2025. The plan acknowledges that public authorities need to be more open, which has led to low data sharing and cooperation in tackling social issues. Latvian public administration still invests little effort in using data from other institutions. Thus, much remains to be done for public administration to become a unified data source rather than an independent data operator.
The open data portal data.gov.lv is intended to be a single access point for data. However, state institutions publish data on their own initiative, and the volume of data varies. A wide range of data is also available through the Electronic Procurement System (EIS), the Latvian State Land Service publication VZD and e-services portal kadastrs.lv, the Register of Enterprises website, Latvija.lv, and the TAP portal. While the data platforms are regularly updated, they are not synchronized.
During an audit of public administration reform in 2022, the State Audit Office concluded that the unavailability of quality data has been a critical issue for at least ten years and needs to be sufficiently addressed (Valsts kontrole, 2022).
The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development (MoEPRD) has served as the Single Information Point in Latvia since September 2023. The ministry mediates between those seeking to reuse data and the relevant authorities. Upon receiving a request for data reuse or information, the Single Information Point directs it to the appropriate authority. In turn, these authorities are responsible for aiding re-users by providing necessary information and outlining conditions for the secure reuse of data (Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija, 2023).
The evaluation of public sector data sets in Latvia shows varied results. Data sets published on the open data portal performed best, while those not published or only partially published showed poorer results. This evaluation indicates a need for more consistent and comprehensive data publication across government entities to better meet citizen demands for information diversity, comparability, and detail.
Data is generally provided in a timely manner; however, some data lags by months or even a year. While there has been good progress in the transparency of public sector information, some agencies and bodies still rely partly on revenues from data sales. For example, public access to high-value commercial data about enterprises is a fee-based service. The practice of charging for access to data creates a financial barrier that can significantly impact demand. This issue highlights the ongoing tension between the objectives of open data access and the economic models of certain public authorities.
Citations:
Ministru kabinets. 2022. Latvijas piektais nacionālās atvērtās pārvaldības rīcības plāns 2022.-2025. gadam. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/12754/download?attachment
Latvijas Atvērto datu portāls. “In Latvian.” https://data.gov.lv/lv
Valsts kontrole. 2022. “Valsts pārvalde – ‘qua vadis’? Valsts pārvaldes reformā plānotais un sasniegtais.” https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile/29503-2AUhLznqlrVyEDa94OM3Y7F7vBQTOBB1.pdf
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Atvērtie dati.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atvertie-dati
Delna. 2023. “Publiskā sektora datu kopu pieejamība Latvijā.” https://delna.lv/lv/2023/07/14/publiska-sektora-datu-kopu-pieejamiba-latvija/
The open data portal data.gov.lv is intended to be a single access point for data. However, state institutions publish data on their own initiative, and the volume of data varies. A wide range of data is also available through the Electronic Procurement System (EIS), the Latvian State Land Service publication VZD and e-services portal kadastrs.lv, the Register of Enterprises website, Latvija.lv, and the TAP portal. While the data platforms are regularly updated, they are not synchronized.
During an audit of public administration reform in 2022, the State Audit Office concluded that the unavailability of quality data has been a critical issue for at least ten years and needs to be sufficiently addressed (Valsts kontrole, 2022).
The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development (MoEPRD) has served as the Single Information Point in Latvia since September 2023. The ministry mediates between those seeking to reuse data and the relevant authorities. Upon receiving a request for data reuse or information, the Single Information Point directs it to the appropriate authority. In turn, these authorities are responsible for aiding re-users by providing necessary information and outlining conditions for the secure reuse of data (Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija, 2023).
The evaluation of public sector data sets in Latvia shows varied results. Data sets published on the open data portal performed best, while those not published or only partially published showed poorer results. This evaluation indicates a need for more consistent and comprehensive data publication across government entities to better meet citizen demands for information diversity, comparability, and detail.
Data is generally provided in a timely manner; however, some data lags by months or even a year. While there has been good progress in the transparency of public sector information, some agencies and bodies still rely partly on revenues from data sales. For example, public access to high-value commercial data about enterprises is a fee-based service. The practice of charging for access to data creates a financial barrier that can significantly impact demand. This issue highlights the ongoing tension between the objectives of open data access and the economic models of certain public authorities.
Citations:
Ministru kabinets. 2022. Latvijas piektais nacionālās atvērtās pārvaldības rīcības plāns 2022.-2025. gadam. https://www.mk.gov.lv/lv/media/12754/download?attachment
Latvijas Atvērto datu portāls. “In Latvian.” https://data.gov.lv/lv
Valsts kontrole. 2022. “Valsts pārvalde – ‘qua vadis’? Valsts pārvaldes reformā plānotais un sasniegtais.” https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile/29503-2AUhLznqlrVyEDa94OM3Y7F7vBQTOBB1.pdf
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. 2023. “Atvērtie dati.” https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atvertie-dati
Delna. 2023. “Publiskā sektora datu kopu pieejamība Latvijā.” https://delna.lv/lv/2023/07/14/publiska-sektora-datu-kopu-pieejamiba-latvija/