Key Challenges
Latvia’s economic growth has been stable over the long term. Thanks to sustained efforts, Latvia has implemented a sustainable budgetary policy and maintained the lowest public debt in the EU. However, the IMF, OECD, and EU recommend that Latvia address the high inflation rate and its negative consequences and increase investments in productivity.
Public trust in the government has been low for at least the last two decades, slowing some reforms. To maintain economic growth, the government must take decisive steps to reduce social inequality, poverty risk, and the shadow economy. Latvia’s tax and benefit income distribution system is inadequate, so inequality and poverty will remain challenges for the upcoming decade.
Reforms in healthcare and education are crucial for addressing the aging population and creating an inclusive labor market. Although these areas, along with security, are politically recognized priorities, the costs of these reforms must be balanced with policy outcomes and fiscal capability.
Failure to properly address education, healthcare, and the tax burden for small businesses and low-wage earners may accelerate emigration and depopulation, especially in rural areas. The administrative burden on small businesses is a significant challenge that needs addressing to foster a better business environment, moving toward more simplified reporting and accounting.
Although Latvia has developed a solid policy-planning system, the administrative burden and level of normativism have increased. Current public administration reforms aim at digitalization, innovation, and human resources development. However, the modernization plan (2023–2027) has a limited scope and neglects a whole-of-governance approach, risking further diminishing public trust in bureaucracy.
Policy coordination within bureaucracies generally functions smoothly within formal boundaries on well-known issues. However, challenges remain for public administration to effectively address complex problems. Strengthening Latvia’s resilience requires better intergovernmental policy coordination and enhanced communication with local authorities. Evidence-based policymaking also presents challenges, as external evidence producers like academia and NGO experts remain underfinanced.
After the administrative-territorial reform in 2021, local authorities continue to face challenges aligning the volume of tasks with available financial resources. More extensive dialogue between the government and local authorities is essential to improving policy implementation.
Latvia has extensive tools for public participation in decision-making; however, actual participation rates are low, limited by the capacity of individuals and NGOs. Some NGOs have accumulated experience, human resources, and financial capability, but smaller NGOs lack resources and operate within project-governed schemes, hindering their sustainability.
Latvia is committed to contributing to global environmental protection and climate change mitigation. However, decisive steps are needed to increase green energy use, energy independence, and sustainable business practices. Most habitats and species compete with extensive agriculture and the timber industry, where industrial interests prevail. Therefore, education and awareness of conservation farming and timber methods are essential in Latvia.